Motivation for Language Learning: After All We Have Been Studying These since Primary School

Author :  

Year-Number: 2018-Volume 6 Issue 1
Language : English
Konu : null
Number of pages: 496-513
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

The role of motivation in successful learning has been recognised and researched extensively. Recently the theory of self was adapted to language learning motivation, claiming one’s current and possible future selves has a significant impact on their learning a foreign language. Aiming to build on the research on motivational self-systems in language learning, this study investigates tertiary level English language learners’ motivational self-systems in the Turkish context. To this end, data was collected from 38 pre-school teacher trainees in a mixed methods research. The majority of the participants reported stronger and more vivid ideal L2 selves than ought-to L2 selves. Similarly, instrumental promotion motives are reportedly more influential than instrumental prevention motives in the participants’ motivation to learn English. These findings support the previous research on motivational self-systems. In this research, however, it is also found out that the learners’ past learning experiences play a great role in shaping their current and future selves, thus have a great impact on the learners’ motivation to learn English. The results show that repetitive learning practices without an element of optimal challenge and novelty result in low motivated behaviour and negative learning experiences. Additionally, the findings also point out that the learners’ intended motivated behavior does not match with their current motivated behaviour. Data suggest that this mismatch too is a result of the learners’ past learning experiences.

Keywords


  • Atkinson, J. W. (1966). “Motivational Determinants of Risk-Taking Behaviour”, in Atkinson, J. W. and

  • Atkinson, J. W. (1966). “Motivational Determinants of Risk-Taking Behaviour”, in Atkinson, J. W. and Feather N. T. (Eds) A Theory of Achievement Motivation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Cid, E., Granena, G. & Tragant, E. (2009). “Constructing and Validating the Foreign Language Attitudes and Goals Survey (FLAGS)”. System, 37(3), 496-513.

  • Csizer, K. & Kormos, J. (2009). “Learning Experiences, Selves and Motivated Learning Behaviour: AComparative Analysis of Structural Models for Hungarian Secondary and University Learners ofEnglish”. In Z. Dornyei, & E, Ushioda (Eds.) Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self (pp. 98- 119) Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

  • Csizer, K. & Magid, M. (2014). “The Self-Concept and Language Learning: An Introduction”. In K.Csizer & M. Magid (Eds.) The Impact Of Self-Concept On Language Learning (pp. 1-4) Bristol, UK:Multilingual Matters.Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behaviour. New York: Plenum Press

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and Researching Motivation. Harolow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2009). “The L2 Motivational Self System”. In Z. Dornyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.) Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self (pp.9-42). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

  • Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social Psychology and Second Language Learning the Role of Attitudes and Motivation. London: Edward Arnold

  • Irie, K. (2003). “What Do We Know About the Language Learning Motivation of University Students in Japan? Some Patterns in Survey Studies”. JALT Journal, 25(1), 86-100.

  • Kimura, Y., Nakata, Y. & Okumura, T. (2003). “Language Learning Motivation of EFL Learners in Japan – A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Various Learning Milieus”. JALT Journal. 23(1), 47-68.

  • Kırkgöz, Y., Çelik, S. & Arıkan, A. (2016) “Laying the Theoretical and Practical Foundations for A NewElementary English Curriculum in Turkey? A Procedural Analysis”. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 24(3), pp. 1199-1212.

  • Kormos, J. & Csizér, K. (2008). “Age-Related Differences in the Motivation of Learning English as aForeign Language: Attitudes, Selves, and Motivated Learning Behaviour”. Language Learning, 58(2), 327-355.

  • Lamb, M. (2004). “Integrative Motivation in a Globalizing World”. System, 32(1), 3-19.

  • Lamb, M. (2012). “A Self System Perspective on Young Adolescents’ Motivation to Learn English in Urban and Rural Settings”. Language Learning, 62(4), 997-1023.

  • Li, Q. (2014). “Differences in the Motivation of Chinese Learners of English in a Foreign and Second Language Context”. System, 42, 451-461.

  • LoCastro, V. (2001). “Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition: Attitudes, Learner Subjectivity, and L2 Pragmatic Norms”. System, 29(1), 69-89.

  • Lyons, D. (2014). “The L2 Self-Concept in Second Language Learning Motivation: A LongitudinalStudy of Korean University Students”. In K. Csizer & M. Magid (Eds.) The impact of self-concept on language learning (pp. 108-130) Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

  • Moskovsky, C., Assulaimani, T., Racheva, S., & Harkins, J. (2016). “The L2 Motivational Self Systemand L2 Achievement: A Study of Saudi EFL Learners”. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 641-654.Nikolov, M. (1999). “‘Why Do You Learn English?’ ‘Because the Teacher is Short.’ A Study ofHungarian Children’s Foreign Language Learning Motivation”. Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 33- 56.

  • Oxford, R. & Shearin, J. (1994). “Language Learning Motivation: Expanding the Theoretical Framework”. The Modern Language Journal. 78(1), 12-28.

  • Papi, M. & Teimouri, Y. (2012). “Dynamics of Selves and Motivation: A Cross-Sectional Study in the EFL Context in Iran”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(3), 287-309.

  • Papi, M. (2010). “The L2 Motivational Self System, L2 Anxiety, and the Motivated Behaviour: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach”. System, 38, 467-479.

  • Peng, J.-E. (2015). “L2 Motivational Self System, Attitudes, and Affect as Predictors of L2 WTC: An Imagined Community Perspective”. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(2), 433-443.

  • Stipek, D. 2002. Motivation to Learn: Integrating Theory and Practice (Fourth Edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

  • Taguchi, T., Magid, M., & Papi, M. (2009). “The L2 Motivational Self System among Japanese, Chineseand Iranian Learners of English: A Comparative Study”. In Z. Dornyei, & E, Ushioda (Eds.) Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self (pp. 66-97)Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

  • Ushioda, E. (1996). Learner Autonomy: The Role of Motivation. Dublin: Authentik.

  • Ushioda, E. (2011). “Motivating Learners to Speak as Themselves”. In G. Murray, X. Gao, & T. Lamb(Eds.) Identity, Motivation and Autonomy in Language Learning (pp. 11-24). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

  • Ushioda, E., & Dornyei, Z. (2009). “Motivation, Language Identities and the L2 Self: A TheoreticalOverview”. In Z. Dornyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.) Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self (pp.1-8). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

  • Yashima, T. (2009). “International Posture and the Ideal L2 Self in the Japanese EFL Context”. In Z.Dornyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.) Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self (pp.144-163). Bristol, UK: Appendix 1

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics