A Case Study on the Analysis of the Worksheets Used in a Language Preparatory School in Higher Education

Author :  

Year-Number: 2016-Volume 4 Issue 3
Language : English
Konu : null
Number of pages: 36-47
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

The aim of this case study is to analyze the supplementary instructional materials, namely worksheets, used in an English preparatory school in one of the Turkish universities. The data were gathered from the materials development unit of the school. Using the content analysis method, worksheets from 2015 spring and 2016 spring terms were analyzed. The findings revealed that most worksheets included decontextualized, repetitive grammar activities though the theme-based course book included integrated skills activities, appealing various learning styles. It was also observed that students were evaluated based on their proficiency in basic four skills while they studied mostly grammar based worksheets. As a result, a shift to a more eclectic method which caters for all learning styles and equally includes all skills is suggested to the school board.

Keywords

Abstract

The aim of this case study is to analyze the supplementary instructional materials, namely worksheets, used in an English preparatory school in one of the Turkish universities. The data were gathered from the materials development unit of the school. Using the content analysis method, worksheets from 2015 spring and 2016 spring terms were analyzed. The findings revealed that most worksheets included decontextualized, repetitive grammar activities though the theme-based course book included integrated skills activities, appealing various learning styles. It was also observed that students were evaluated based on their proficiency in basic four skills while they studied mostly grammar based worksheets. As a result, a shift to a more eclectic method which caters for all learning styles and equally includes all skills is suggested to the school board.

Keywords


  • Bayrak N (2008). Yapılandırmacı Öğrenme Yaklaşımının Beş Aşamalı Modeline Uygun Olarak

  • Bayrak N (2008). Yapılandırmacı Öğrenme Yaklaşımının Beş Aşamalı Modeline Uygun OlarakGeliştirilen Ders Yazılımı ve Çalışma Yapraklarının Öğrencilerin Başarısına, Öğrenilen BilgilerinKalıcılığına ve Öğrencilerin Fen Bilgisi Dersine Yönelik Tutumlarına Etkisinin İncelenmesi, Unpublished Master's Thesis, Atatürk University, Erzurum.

  • Biçer N (2016). An evaluation of pre-service Turkish teachers’ skills and knowledge regardingpreparation of worksheets to teaching Turkish to foreigners, Educational Research and Reviews, 11(5):164-173.

  • Boston C (2002). The Concept of Formative Assessment. Eric Digest. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED470206.pdf

  • British Council (2015). The State of English in Higher Education in Turkey. http://www.britishcouncil.org.tr/sites/default/files/he_baseline_study_book_web_-_son.pdf

  • Crawford J (2002). The role of materials in the language classroom: finding the balance. In RichardJC , Renandya WA (eds.) Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice, CUP, New York.

  • Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed.), Routledge, London.

  • Dede N (2010). Atom konusunda geliştirilen çalışma yapraklarının öğrenci başarısında etkisi, E- Journal of New World Sciences Academy Education Series, 5(1):210-227.

  • Demircioğlu H, Demircioğlu G, Ayas A (2004). Kavram yanılgılarının çalışma yapraklarıyla giderilmesine yönelik bir çalışma, Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 163:121-131.

  • Elvan Ö (2012). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretiminde Çalışma Yaprakları Kullanılmasının Kavram Yanılgılarını Gidermeye Etkisi, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir.

  • Harmer J (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching (4th ed.), Longman-Pearson, Cambridge.

  • Holsti OR (1969). Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

  • Hughes J, Stephenson H, Dummett P (2013). Life Pre-Intermediate Student’s Book, National Geographic Learning, UK.

  • Kaymakçı S (2006). Tarih Öğretmenlerinin Çalışma Yaprakları Hakkındaki Görüşleri, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Karadeniz Teknik University, Trabzon.

  • Kaymakçı S (2012). A review of studies on worksheets in Turkey, US-China Education Review, A 1(2012):57-64.

  • Lightbown PM, Spada N (2013). How Languages Are Learned (4th ed), Oxford University Press, China.

  • Richards JC, Rodgers TS (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (3rd ed.), CUP, New York.

  • Roberts CW (Ed.) (1997). Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: Methods for Drawing Statistical Inferences from Texts and Transcripts, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.

  • Sarıçoban A (2006). Instructional Technologies and Materials Design for Foreign Language Teaching, Anı: Ankara.

  • Shrum JL, Glisan EW (2010). Teacher’s Handbook: Contextualized Language Education (4

  • Tan E (2008). The effects of worksheets prepared on the basis of constructive approach about thesubject of adverbs which is taught in primary school grade seven classes on student achievement, Unpublished master’s thesis, Atatürk University Graduate School of Social Sciences, Erzurum.

  • Tomlinson B (2012) Materials development for language learning and teaching, Language Teaching, 45(2):143-179.

  • Tomlinson B (eds.) (2009). Materials Development in Language Teaching (12th ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • YABDIL (2016). Amaç ve Faaliyetler. http://yabdil.ankara.edu.tr/?page_id=45

  • Yiğit N, Alev N, Özmen H, Altun T, Akyıldız S (2007). Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Geliştirme, Akademi Kitapevi, Trabzon.

  • Weber RP (1990). Basic Content Analysis (2nd ed), Sage, California. Appendix A

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics