Examining the Perceptions of English Instructors Regarding the Incorporation of Global Citizenship Education into ELT

Author :  

Year-Number: 2017-Volume 5 Issue 4
Language : English
Konu : null
Number of pages: 409-425
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore the perceptions of ELT instructors working at a higher education institution in Turkey regarding integrating global citizenship education into ELT courses. The study was carried out by using phenomenological design, which is one of the qualitative studies. The data were collected using interview method and a semi-structured interview form was developed by the researcher as the data collection tool. The participants, selected on the basis of easily accessible sampling method, which is one of the purposeful sampling methods. The participants comprises of 13 English instructors who work at a higher education institution in the Central Anatolia Region in the academic year 2015-2016. Instructors’ opinions were taken regarding how they described global citizenship, what were their roles and responsibilities in educating students as global citizens, how they practiced global citizenship education in their classes, and the challenges they were facing in practicing global citizenship education in ELT courses. Data were analysed with content analysis technique. Findings revealed that participants mostly focused on the “value” dimension of global citizenship such as respect, sensitivity, sense of belonging, responsibility, openness, etc. The instructors deemed their roles and responsibilities in preparing students as global citizens as an informer and role model. While most of the participants stated that they did not involve any specific teaching practices in their classes to educate students as global citizens, as they thought ELT lessons and global citizenship education were irrelevant, addressing global issues in the courses and role modelling were conducted by few instructors to promote global citizenship. Predominantly grammar-based teaching and student unwillingness were found as challenges of integrating global citizenship into ELT. As a result, it was concluded that ELT instructors have insufficient levels of knowledge, skills, attitude and action related with global citizenship education.

Keywords


  • Akçay, R. C. (2003). Küreselleşme, eğitimsel yoksunluk ve yetişkin eğitimi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 159.

  • Akçay, R. C. (2003). Küreselleşme, eğitimsel yoksunluk ve yetişkin eğitimi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 159. Retrieved from http://dhgm.meb.gov.tr/yayimlar/dergiler/Milli_Egitim_Dergisi/159/akcay.htm.

  • Arıkan, A. (2009). Environmental peace education in foreign language learners’ English grammar lessons. Journal of Peace Education, 6(1), 87-99.

  • Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A. & Wesche, M. B. (1989). Content-based Second Language Instruction. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.

  • Brownlie, A. 2001. Citizenship education: the global dimension, guidance for key stages 3 and 4., London: Development Education Association.

  • Burrows, D. (2004). World citizenship. Paper presented at the American Council on EducationRegional Conference on New Directions in International Education, Beloit, Wisconsin. Retrieved from https://www.beloit.edu/oie/assets/Burrows.pdf.

  • Byram, M. (2003). Teaching languages for democratic citizenship in Europe and beyond. In K, Brown,& M, Brown (Eds.). Reflections on citizenship in a multilingual world,15-24. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.

  • Byram, M., Gribkova, B. & Starkey, H. (2002). Developing the intercultural dimension in language teaching:A practical introduction for teachers. The Council of Europe. Retrieved from http://lrc.cornell.edu/director/intercultural.pdf.

  • Cates, K. A. (2009). Teaching for a better world: Global issues and language education, Human Rights Education in Asian Schools, 5, 41-52.

  • Cates, K. (2000). Entry for global education. In Byram, M. (Ed.). Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning, 241-243. London: Routledge.

  • Cates, K. A. (1997). New trends in global issues and English teaching. The Language Teacher. Retrieved from http://jalt-publications.org/old_tlt/files/97/may/cates.html onNovember01, 2015.

  • Chowdhury, P. (2013). ELT for peace education: Negotiating ethnic and cultural plurality. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 4(1), 149-153

  • Crandal, J. (1993). ‘Content-centered language learning’. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 111- 126.

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

  • Davies, L. (2006). Global citizenship: Abstraction of framework for action? Educational Review, 58 (1), 5-Dyer, B. & B. Bushell. (1996). World issues or a global perspective? The Language Teacher Online,Retrieved15, 2015, from http://jalt-publications.org/tlt/articles/2065-world-issues-or-global- perspective.

  • Erfani, S. M. (2012). The rationale for iıntroducing “global issues” in English textbook development. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(11), 2412-2416.

  • Focho, G. N. (2010). Language as tool for a global education: Bridging the gap between the traditional and a global curriculum. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 3(1), 135-148.

  • Günay, D. (2012). Perspectives on identity representation in intermediate level English Language Teachingcoursebooks used in Turkey (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Istanbul University Social Sciences Institute, Istanbul, Turkey.

  • Gürsoy, E. (2010). Implementing environmental education to foreign language teaching to young learners. Educational Research, 1(8), 232-238.

  • Gürsoy, E. & Sağlam, G. T. (2011). ELT teacher trainees’ attitudes towards environmental educationand their tendency to use it in the language classroom. Journal of International Education Research- JIER, 7(4), 47-52.

  • Gürsoy, E. & Salı, P. (2014). A language course within the scheme of socially responsible teaching: ELT trainees’ expectations. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(2), 355-365.

  • Hosack, I. (2012). Citizenship and language education in Japanese high schools. In P, Cunningham & N, Fretwell (Eds.). Creating communities: Local, national and global, 132 – 144. London: CiCe.

  • Hosack, I. (2011). Foreign language teaching for global citizenship. Policy Science, 18(3), 125-140.Jacobs, G. M. & Cates, K. (1999). Global education in second language teaching. KATA, 1(1), 1999, 44- 56.

  • Jacobs, G. M. & Goatly, A. (2000). The treatment of ecological issues in ELT coursebooks. ELT Journal, 54(3), 256-264.

  • Jing, H. (2013). Global awareness: Foreign language teachers’ beliefs and practices. Intercultural Communication Studies, 22(1), 95-116.

  • Kan, Ç. (2009). Değişen değerler ve küresel vatandaşlık eğitimi [Changing values and global citizenship education]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 17(3), 895-904.

  • Kruger, F. (2012). The role of TESOL in educating for peace. Journal of Peace Education, 9(1), 17–30.

  • Lima, C.O. & Brown, S.W. (2007). ICT for development: Are Brazilian students well prepared to become global citizens? Educational Media International. 44 (2), 141-153.

  • Marshal, H. (2007). Global education in perspective in an English secondary school. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(3), 353–374.

  • Met, M. (1991). Learning language through content: learning content through language. Foreign Language Annals, 24(4),281-295.

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Mohan, B. A. (1986). Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

  • Nault, D. (2006). Going global: Rethinking culture teaching in ELT contexts. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19:3, 314-328, DOI: 10.1080/07908310608668770.

  • Omidvar, R. & Sukumar, B. (2013). The effects of global education in the English language conversation classroom. English Language Teaching, 6(7), 151-157.

  • Osler, A. & Starkey, H. (2005). Changing citizenship-democracy and inclusion in education. England: Open University Press.

  • Oxfam (2006). Education for global citizenship: A guide for schools. Retrieved from http://www.oxfam.org.uk/coolplanet/teachers/globciti/downloads/gcguide06.pdf

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. USA: Sage Publications

  • Pramata, H. & Yuliati (2016). Global education in English classroom: Integrating global issues into English Language Teaching. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 6(9), 719-722.

  • Prodromou, L. (1992). What culture? Which culture? Cross-cultural factors in language learning. ELT Journal, 46(1), 39-50.

  • Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Sağlam, G.T. & Gürsoy, E. (2010). ELT teacher trainees’ awareness on environmental issues and theirintegration to the curriculum. Proceedings from ICONTE-International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 11-13 Nov., 2010, Antalya, Turkey.

  • Salı, P.& Gürsoy, E. (2014). Evaluation of a language course within the framework of socially responsible teaching. ELT Research Journal, 3(3), 140-152.

  • Sato, R. (1999). Global issues: A communicative activity with integrated grammar. DepartmentalBulletin Paper of KANAGAWA University Repository, 21, 63-79. Retrieved from http://klibredb.lib.kanagawa-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10487/3761/1/kana-12-11-0003.pdf.

  • Serrano, J. R. (2008). ELT and citizenship: Basic principles to raise social awareness through language teaching. HOW, 15(1), 63-82.

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications Ltd.

  • Swenson, T. & Cline, B. (1993). Global issues in a content-based curriculum. The Language Teacher, 17(5), 27,40.

  • Topkaya, Y. (2016). Sosyal Bilgiler öğretmenlerinin değer aktarım yaklaşımları hakkındakigörüşlerine ait nitel bir çalışma [The opinions of Social Studies teachers regarding value transferapproaches: A qualitative study]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 17(1), 637-652.

  • UNESCO (2015). Global ctizenship education: Topics and learning objectives.

  • UNESCO (2014). Global citizenship education: Preparing learners for the challenges of the 21st century.

  • Wang, C. & Hoffman, D. M. (2016). Are WE the world? A critical reflection on selfhood and globalcitizenship education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(56) 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2152 T

  • Yakovchuk, N. (2004). Global issues and global values in foreign language education: Selection and awareness-raising. ELTED, 8, 28-47.

  • Yamashiro, A. D. & McLaughlin, J. W. (1999). The EFL NGO Forum: Integrating Cooperative Learningand Global Issues. In D. Kluge, S. McGuire, D. Johnson, & R. Johnson (Eds.), Cooperative Learning ,82- 94. Tokyo: Japan Association for Language Teaching.

  • Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, A. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] (5. Ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics