FACTORS AFFECTING ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHERS’ PARTICIPATION IN ONLINE COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE: THE CASE OF WEBHEADS IN ACTION
Author :
Abstract
An online community of practice (OCoP) is a group of people, who are brought together by a shared interest and with the aim of deepening their understanding of an area of knowledge through regular interactions facilitated by computer mediated communication (CMC) tools. An OCoP potentially provides teachers with those elements of effective professional development (PD), cited in the literature, such as; collaboration, opportunities for mentoring, and sustainability over time. In this sense, OCoPs can be considered as a viable alternative for teacher PD. If OCoPs are to become an alternative approach to teacher PD then it is important to understand what factors affect teachers’ participation in such communities. Therefore, through the case of Webheads in Action (WiA) OCoP, this study aimed to identify what factors contribute towards creating successful OCoPs. Members’ interactions in WiA’s public group page were collated over a period of nine months and interviews with 24 members of the community (4 core, 9 active, 11 peripheral) were used to gather the data. Two major themes emerged in relation to factors affecting members’ participation in this OCoP. The first one was identified as the creation of a sense of belonging to the community which was achieved through various means such as having an initiation process and fostering trust and an inclusive community environment through community norms. The second was dynamism inherent in the community which manifested itself as new topics that kept members interested and participating, and a flow of continuous member recruitment to the community. In conclusion, this study highlighted the importance of the socio-affective dimension for designing and sustaining OCoPs.
Keywords
Abstract
An online community of practice (OCoP) is a group of people, who are brought together by a shared interest and with the aim of deepening their understanding of an area of knowledge through regular interactions facilitated by computer mediated communication (CMC) tools. An OCoP potentially provides teachers with those elements of effective professional development (PD), cited in the literature, such as; collaboration, opportunities for mentoring, and sustainability over time. In this sense, OCoPs can be considered as a viable alternative for teacher PD. If OCoPs are to become an alternative approach to teacher PD then it is important to understand what factors affect teachers’ participation in such communities. Therefore, through the case of Webheads in Action (WiA) OCoP, this study aimed to identify what factors contribute towards creating successful OCoPs. Members’ interactions in WiA’s public group page were collated over a period of nine months and interviews with 24 members of the community (4 core, 9 active, 11 peripheral) were used to gather the data. Two major themes emerged in relation to factors affecting members’ participation in this OCoP. The first one was identified as the creation of a sense of belonging to the community which was achieved through various means such as having an initiation process and fostering trust and an inclusive community environment through community norms. The second was dynamism inherent in the community which manifested itself as new topics that kept members interested and participating, and a flow of continuous member recruitment to the community. In conclusion, this study highlighted the importance of the socio-affective dimension for designing and sustaining OCoPs.
Keywords
- AoIR. (2012). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee. Retrieved from http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf.
- Blitz, C. L. (2013) Can online learning communities achieve the goals of traditional professional learning communities? What the literature says. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic.
- Booth, S. E. (2012). Cultivating knowledge sharing and trust in online communities for educators. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 47(1), 1-31.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
- Bryman, A. (1989). Research methods and organisation studies. London: Routledge.
- Carr, N., & Chambers, D. P. (2006). Teacher professional learning in an online community: The experiences of the national quality schooling framework pilot project. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 15(2), 143-157.
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. New York: Routledge.
- cokehead. (n.d.). The dictionary of American slang Retrieved 25 May, 2015, from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/cokehead
- Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Thomason, S., & Firth, A. (2005). The impact of collaborative continuing professional development (CPD) on classroom teaching and learning. Review: How do collaborative and sustained CPD and sustained but not collaborative CPD affect teaching and learning? In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
- Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. The Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597-604.
- Guzey, S. S., & Roehrig, G. H. (2009). Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers’ development of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 25-45.
- Hew, K. F. (2009). Determinants of success for online communities: An analysis of three communities in terms of members' perceived professional development. Behaviour and Information Technology, 28(5), 433-445.
- Hunter, B. (2001). Against the odds: Professional development and innovation under less-than- ideal conditions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(4), 473-496.
- Johnson, C. M. (2005). Establishing an online community of practice for instructors of English as a foreign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Nova Southeastern University. Fort Lauderdale, Floreida.
- Jones, A., & Preece, J. (2006). Online communities for teachers and lifelong learners: A framework for comparing similarities and identifying differences in communities of practice and communities of interest. International Journal of Learning and Technology, 2(2-3), 112-137.
- Kulavuz-Onal, D. (2013). English language teachers' learning to teach with technology through participation in an online community of practice: A netnography of Webheads in Action. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of South Florida. Florida.
- Lai, K. W., Pratt, K., Anderson, M., & Stigter, J. (2006) Literature review and synthesis: Online communities of practice. New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Little, J. W. (1987). Teachers as colleagues. In V. Richardson-Koehler (Ed.), Educators’ Handbook: A research perspective (pp. 491-518). New York: Longman.
- Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantiative, qualiutative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- MoNE. (n.d.). About FATIH project Retrieved November 11, 2016, from http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/en/?page_id=10
- OECD. (1998) Staying ahead: In-service training and teacher professional development. Paris: Author.
- OECD. (2009) Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris: Author.
- petrolhead. (n.d.). The dictionary of American slang Retrieved 25 May, 2015, from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/petrolhead
- Preece, J. (2004). Etiquette, empathy and trust in communities of practice. Stepping-stones to social capital. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 10(3), 194-202.
- Rieber, R. W. (Ed.). (1997). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: (Volume 4) The history of the development of higher mental functions. New York: Plenum Press.
- Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Sharratt, M., & Usoro, A. (2003). Understanding knowledge-sharing in online communities of practice. Electronic Journal on Knowledge Management, 1(187-196).
- Thang, S. M., Hall, C., Murugaiah, P., & Azman, H. (2011). Creating and maintaining online communities of practice in Malaysian smart schools: Challenging realities. Educational Action Research, 19(1), 87-105.
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Walter, C., & Briggs, J. (2012). What professional development makes the most difference to teachers? A report sponsored by Oxford University Press.
- Warford, M. K. (2011). The zone of proximal teacher development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 252-258.
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Cambridge: MA: Harvard Business School Press.
- Wenger, E., White, N., & Smith, J. D. (2009). Digital habitats: Stewarding technology for communities. Portland, OR: CPsquare.
- Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
