Türkiye'de İngilizce Öğretim Programlarının Teknoloji Entegrasyonu Fırsatları Açısından Değerlendirilmesi

Author :  

Year-Number: 2020-8.4
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2020-12-12 08:43:01.0
Language : İngilizce
Konu : Yabancı Dil Eğitimi
Number of pages: 159-170
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Yabancı dil öğrenme ve öğretme sürecine teknolojinin dâhil edilmesi; mobil, bilgisayar ve internet destekli dil öğrenme fırsatlarındaki son gelişmelerin ortaya çıkmasıyla büyük önem kazanmıştır. Bu çalışma, 2-8 ve 9-12. sınıflar için mevcut İngilizce öğretim programlarında sunulan teknoloji entegrasyonu fırsatlarını ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlamaktadır. Yapılan doküman incelemesinden elde edilen bulgulara göre, İngilizce öğretim programlarının teknoloji entegrasyonunu açıkça tavsiye ettiği belirlenmiştir. Teknoloji kullanımına yapılan vurgu, özellikle öğretim programlarının da ana felsefesine dâhil edilmiştir. Ayrıca, teknoloji entegrasyonunun, öğrenciler için zenginleştirilmiş bağlamlar sağlamak, teknolojiyle geliştirilmiş görevler, etkinlikler ve değerlendirme teknikleri tasarlamak için özellikle tavsiye edildiği belirlenmiştir.

 

Keywords

Abstract

Technology integration into foreign language learning and teaching process is attached great importance with the advent of recent developments in mobile, computer, and web-enhanced language learning opportunities. This study aims to uncover the opportunities for technology integration presented in the current ELT curricula for 2nd-8th and 9th-12th grades. Document analysis of the curricula indicated that technology integration is strongly recommended in language learning and teaching process in the EFL context of Turkey. The emphasis on technology use is particularly included in the major philosophy of the curricula. It was also determined that technology integration is specifically recommended for providing enriched contexts, designing technology-enhanced tasks, activities, and assessment techniques for learners

 

Keywords


  • Bruce, B., & Levin, J. (2001). Roles for new technologies in language arts: Inquiry, communication, construction, and expression. In J. Jenson, J. Flood, D. Lapp, & J. Squire (Eds.), The handbook for research on teaching the language arts. NY: Macmillan.

  • Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge University Press, UK. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524681

  • Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. John Benjamins Publishing.

  • Council of Europe (2006). A user’s guide to the European Language Portfolio reference documents. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. [Available at http://www.coe.int/portfolio, section ‘Procedure for validation’.]

  • Council of Europe 2001, Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Language Policy Division, Strasbourg, France.

  • Crawford, G. B. (2007). Brain-based teaching with adolescent learning in mind. 2nd Ed. California: Corwin Press.

  • Ekmekçi, E. (2019). Curricula-Related Issues in Turkey and ELT. In Yaman, İ., Ekmekçi, E., & Şenel, M. (ed), Basics of ELT (pp. 590-623). Blackswan Publishing.

  • European Union (2018). Council recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union, 4(6).

  • Frigaard, A. (2002). Does the computer lab improve student performance on vocabulary, grammar, and listening comprehension? ERIC Document Reproduction Service. No. ED476749.

  • Hismanoglu, M. (2012). The impact of a curricular innovation on prospective EFL teachers' attitudes towards ICT integration into language instruction. International Journal of Instruction, 5(1), 183202.

  • Hua, Z. (2020). A Mode Study on the Integration of Computer Network Technology and College English Curriculum. In 2020 International Conference on Computer Communication and Network Security (CCNS) (pp. 14-16). IEEE.

  • Kilickaya, F. (2010). The Effect of Computer-Assisted Language Learning. Saarbrzcken: VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller e.K.

  • Kirkgöz, Y. (2007). English language teaching in Turkey: Policy changes and their implementations. RELC journal, 38(2), 216-228.

  • Kirkgöz, Y. (2009). Globalization and English language policy in Turkey. Educational Policy, 23(5), 663- 684.

  • Kırkgöz, Y. (2017). English education policy in Turkey. In r. Kirkpatrick (ed), English language education policy in the Middle East and North Africa (pp. 235-256). Springer International Publishing.

  • Lin, W., & Yang, S. (2011). Exploring students’ perceptions of integrating Wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(2), 88-103.

  • Livingstone, K. A. (2019). The Place of Information and Communication Technologies in Curriculum Design and Development. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 15(4), 180-197.

  • Lynch, B. K. (1996). Language program evaluation: Theory and practice. Melbourne Australia: Cambridge University Press.

  • Miner, T. (2004). Using technology to enhance learning: Instructor-or student-moderated discussion boards: Which are more effective? Retrieved from http://www.cccone.org/scholars/0405/TomMiner_final_report.pdf

  • MONE (Turkish Ministry of National Education) (1997). Ilköğretim Okulu 4. ve 5. Sinif Yabanci Dil (Ingilizce) Öğretim Programı. Retrieved from http://tebligler.meb.gov.tr

  • MONE (Turkish Ministry of National Education) (2006). İlköğretim İngilizce dersi 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar öğretim programı. Ankara: T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.

  • MONE (Turkish Ministry of National Education) (2018a). İngilizce dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar). Ankara: T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.

  • MONE (Turkish Ministry of National Education) (2018b). Ortaöğretim İngilizce Dersi (9, 10, 11 ve 12. Sınıflar) Öğretim Programı. Ankara: T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.

  • Murphy, C. (2006). The impact of ICT on primary science. In P. Warwick, E. Wilson & M. Winterbottom (Eds.), Teaching and Learning Primary Science with ICT. Berkshire, England: Open

  • Null, W. (2011). Curriculum: From theory to practice. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers

  • Nunan, D. (2005). Practical English language teaching: teaching grammar; David Nunan, series editor. New York: McGraw-Hill/Contemporary.

  • Özmen, B. (2017). Technology Integration into Curriculum in Different Countries. In Y. K. Usluel (Ed.), Various Aspects of ICT Integration in Education (pp. 61-93). Ankara, TR: Gazi Kitabevi.

  • Riasati, M. J., Allahyar, N., & Tan, K. E. (2012). Technology in language education: Benefits and barriers. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(5), 25-30.

  • Seferoğlu, G. (March 01, 2005). Improving studentsrsquo; pronunciation through accent reduction software. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 303-316.

  • Timucin, M. (2006). Implementing CALL in the EFL context. ELT Journal, 60(3), 262-271. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl006

  • Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31(1), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012970

  • Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (9th Edition). Ankara: Seçkin.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics